Archive for January 15th, 2009

Micro-CHP (μCHP)

January 15th, 2009

It’s μCHP’s turn. So the prime reason to use μCHP is not to generate electricity, but to generate heat. That’s right, it’s a boiler. But it’s a boiler that generates electricity, how cool! So what happens when it’s not cold, you turn the boiler off, and off goes the electricity as well. So you need a grid, and when you turn your boiler off, you are as efficient as the grid.

The fact that you are connected to the grid however is quite useful, because it means that if in course of generating enough heat for your house you generated too much electricity, it’s won’t go to waste. You just pump it into the grid and maybe make some money out of it.

So the efficiency here really comes from generating electricity as you generate heat and not the other way round, as in normal large CHPs. So μCHPs are useless in the summer (just like your boiler). Again the massive efficiency goes down the drain. It’s still better than those old central massive power plants though, so don’t get me wrong.

There are two problems I can think of right now about μCHP. First the poor people at the massive power plant. Not only are they being attacked for something that’s not their fault, (the fact that they have to dump 2/3 of the energy into the sea to give us 1/3, in reality the numbers are better, but still) but now they have to be ready to offset any electricity coming out of our μCHPs in case we feel like switching it off. Because they can’t control us, and we don’t have to even tell them when we are switching off our boilers, no one knows how much μCHP electricity there will be at any one time to count on. So they should always have backup capacity installed, and they have to be very responsive to our whims. Sounds very expensive and difficult.

This is not a big deal if there are a few units installed here and there, but it could be an issue if you have them everywhere.

Second problem, how much money do you give the people for their electricity. Give me too much money and I will have my heating on all the time. Hey you’re the one who’s paying me to heat my house. In summer, I’ll just open all the windows. The cash is worth it. Pay me too little and I won’t care. Why would I pay more for a fancy boiler and then donate my electricity to you. No thank you, I think I will stick with the old system.

So frankly, if you have the right policy in place you will find that indeed μCHPs are useful. But of course they are no where near as useful as some (Greenpeace) want us to believe. No they won’t save the world, but they’ll help bring us one step closer.

  • Share/Bookmark

Revisiting CHP

January 15th, 2009

In a previous post I have touched on why I don’t think CHP is the answer to all the UK’s problems. This time I want to expand a bit. I am not saying that CHP is bad, I am just saying that some people are overrating it. I will try and look at two things here, district heating CHP and microCHP (μCHP).

Let’s start with district heating. So in district heating there is a power plant in the middle of the community (figuratively) and its main role is to generate electricity. But when it generates electricity it also happens to generate heat and this heat is used to heat up the houses and water of the neighborhood. Now there must be some metering mode for the heat, otherwise it is subject to the tragedy of the commons and everyone will have their heating on maximum all the time. If it happens to be too hot they could just open a window, at least they are ventilating their houses.

Ok so we put a meter on the heat exchangers in every house. Now people are paying for both heat and electricity. Come the summer and no one wants the heating on, so everyone turns their heating off. So all the CHP heat has to find somewhere to go. This might actually end up costing the power plant owner some money for a cold utility to take the heat away. Lets hope the neighbourhood is near a river or a sea so they can just pump that water through. Yes there is still demand for hot water, but this is nowhere near as much as required for heating space and water.

OK, I can hear you saying Trigen. Put an absorption refrigerator there and cool the place. This way we haven’t wasted the heat. Now I am quite certain that the efficiency of the refrigeration process is lower than the heating process, so all those claiming 95% efficiency can stop it. It’s better than completely wasting it, but then if we weren’t going to use it in the first place are we wasting it or not?

British people rarely need air conditioning during their two-week summers. There is a substantial time when the weather is somewhat mild, according to British standards, and heating and cooling are not greatly required. What happens then? If they use the heating or cooling when they don’t really want to then it’s wasteful, and if they don’t use it it’s also wasteful. It all depends on the way you look at it.

This would probably be a typical scenario where people become complacent with their energy use because they feel like they have already been more efficient. Buy the energy saver light bulb and keep it on all the time kind of thing. This completely defies the point.

Next post μCHP…

  • Share/Bookmark